Two of the market's most popular income ETFs compared side-by-side. See which one fits your yield strategy.
What this means: Both CONY and TSLY fall intoTier 5: Octane. This suggests they share a similar risk profile and volatility expectation.
| Metric | CONY | TSLY |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -19.65% | 27.02% |
| NAV Change (1Y) | -61.71% | -26.02% |
| Max Drawdown | -72.07% | -43.83% |
| Beta | - | - |
* Returns include dividend reinvestment. Drawdown calculates peak-to-trough decline over trailing 12 months.
CONY and TSLY represent the outer edge of the income-investing spectrum — YieldMax single-stock option income funds that pay weekly distributions with yields that make traditional dividend investors do a double-take. CONY at 18.8% yield on Coinbase exposure and TSLY at 16.0% on Tesla exposure are DivAgent Tier 5 High Octane instruments. The comparison matters not because one is obviously better, but because understanding the differences helps investors deploy these tools appropriately — or avoid them entirely if the risk profile doesn't fit.
The fundamental difference between CONY and TSLY is the stock they reference. CONY is built around Coinbase Global (COIN) — a crypto exchange whose stock price is highly correlated with Bitcoin and Ethereum sentiment. Coinbase can move 20-30% in a single week during crypto events. TSLY references Tesla (TSLA), which is volatile by equity standards but far more predictable than a crypto-adjacent stock. This volatility gap directly explains the yield gap: richer option premiums on COIN generate more income for CONY holders. The tradeoff is that CONY's NAV can also crater faster during Coinbase-specific selloffs.
Both funds use a synthetic covered call structure — they don't actually hold Coinbase or Tesla shares, but replicate exposure through options while selling call options to generate income. When the underlying stock rises sharply, the sold calls get exercised, capping upside participation. The fund collects premium but misses the rally. Over multiple market cycles, this structure tends to result in declining NAV as the fund distributes more than it can regenerate through option premium alone. Neither CONY nor TSLY is designed to preserve principal — they're designed to extract maximum income from volatility. That's not a criticism, it's the explicit design.
No serious financial framework recommends these as core holdings. The appropriate use case — if any — is as a satellite position funded with capital already earmarked for speculation. Some investors use a small CONY or TSLY position to generate weekly cash flow that gets swept into more conservative holdings (SCHD, VYM, ARCC). This "income harvesting" approach treats the YieldMax fund as a high-risk income generator with expected principal decline. Position sizing discipline is everything — most practitioners who use these limit exposure to 1-3% of total portfolio value per fund.
Choose CONY if:
Choose TSLY if:
Every investor has a unique risk profile. Use our Portfolio Intelligence tool to see the impact of adding these ETFs to your holdings.