DivAgent
LeaderboardPortfoliosPortfolio App
Log InGet Started
DivAgent

The institutional-grade income auditor for the retail investor. Stop chasing yield. Start building wealth.

Academy

  • The Income Illusion
  • Defensive Income
  • Avoid Yield Traps
  • View All Courses

Tools & Resources

  • Risk Spectrum Calculator
  • NAV Erosion Check
  • Dividend Glossary
  • Strategy Articles
  • Article Categories
  • Ticker Database Index
  • Comparison Directory

Portfolio App

  • Track Dividends
  • Import Holdings
  • View Dashboard
Free Tier Available

Company

  • Manifesto
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Join 10,000+ Dividend Investors

Weekly insights on sustainable income strategies. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Important Legal Disclaimer

DivAgent is not a registered investment advisor, broker-dealer, or financial analyst. The content on divagent.ai and app.divagent.ai, including ticker audits, risk tiers, dividend forecasts, and "Monthly Expense Kill Lists," is provided for informational and educational purposes only.

Nothing on this platform constitutes a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Investing involves substantial risk, including the possible loss of principal. Past performance, including dividend history, is no guarantee of future results.

Data Accuracy & AI Usage: Dividend data is sourced from third-party providers (including Yahoo Finance). Additionally, portions of the content on this site, including articles, summaries, and analysis, may be generated by Artificial Intelligence (AI). While we strive for accuracy, DivAgent does not guarantee the timeliness, completeness, or correctness of any data or AI-generated content. Predictive forecasts are based on mathematical heuristics and should not be relied upon for financial planning.

Limitation of Liability: DivAgent shall not be held liable for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in the content, whether human-written or AI-generated, nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

By using this site, you acknowledge that you are solely responsible for your own investment decisions. Consult with a qualified financial professional before making any financial commitments.

© 2026 DivAgent. All rights reserved.

DivAgent is an informational platform, not a registered investment advisor. Nothing here is financial advice.

LIVEComparison Engine
Last Updated: March 7, 2026

CONYvsTSLY

Two of the market's most popular income ETFs compared side-by-side. See which one fits your yield strategy.

Data Live

What This Page Shows

  • Yield leader: TSLY (10.98% spread)
  • Safer risk tier: CONY
  • 1Y total return spread: 46.67%
  • Fees, NAV stability, and payout quality side-by-side
  1. Home
  2. Directory
  3. C
  4. CONY vs TSLY

At a Glance

HEAD-TO-HEAD
Scroll for Analysis
CONY
YieldMax
VS
TSLY
YieldMax
42.06%
Annual Yield
53.04%
Tier 5
Risk Tier
Tier 5
-19.65%
1Y Total Return
27.02%
-61.71%
1Y NAV Stability
-26.02%
1.22%
Expense Ratio
1.04%
-72.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y)
-43.83%
Quick Verdict: TSLY wins on5key metrics.

DivAgent Risk Spectrum

Proprietary Model
Tier 1: Cornerstone
Tier 2: Yield Plus
Tier 3: Specialty
Tier 4: Harvest
Tier 5: Octane
CONY
TSLY
Tier 1: Cornerstone
Tier 2: Yield Plus
Tier 3: Specialty
Tier 4: Harvest
Tier 5: Octane

What this means: Both CONY and TSLY fall intoTier 5: Octane. This suggests they share a similar risk profile and volatility expectation.

Deep Dive Analysis

MetricCONYTSLY
Total Return (1Y)-19.65%27.02%
NAV Change (1Y)-61.71%-26.02%
Max Drawdown-72.07%-43.83%
Beta--

* Returns include dividend reinvestment. Drawdown calculates peak-to-trough decline over trailing 12 months.

The DivAgent Analyst Take

CONY and TSLY represent the outer edge of the income-investing spectrum — YieldMax single-stock option income funds that pay weekly distributions with yields that make traditional dividend investors do a double-take. CONY at 18.8% yield on Coinbase exposure and TSLY at 16.0% on Tesla exposure are DivAgent Tier 5 High Octane instruments. The comparison matters not because one is obviously better, but because understanding the differences helps investors deploy these tools appropriately — or avoid them entirely if the risk profile doesn't fit.

Key Differences

Underlying Exposure and Volatility

The fundamental difference between CONY and TSLY is the stock they reference. CONY is built around Coinbase Global (COIN) — a crypto exchange whose stock price is highly correlated with Bitcoin and Ethereum sentiment. Coinbase can move 20-30% in a single week during crypto events. TSLY references Tesla (TSLA), which is volatile by equity standards but far more predictable than a crypto-adjacent stock. This volatility gap directly explains the yield gap: richer option premiums on COIN generate more income for CONY holders. The tradeoff is that CONY's NAV can also crater faster during Coinbase-specific selloffs.

NAV Erosion Mechanics

Both funds use a synthetic covered call structure — they don't actually hold Coinbase or Tesla shares, but replicate exposure through options while selling call options to generate income. When the underlying stock rises sharply, the sold calls get exercised, capping upside participation. The fund collects premium but misses the rally. Over multiple market cycles, this structure tends to result in declining NAV as the fund distributes more than it can regenerate through option premium alone. Neither CONY nor TSLY is designed to preserve principal — they're designed to extract maximum income from volatility. That's not a criticism, it's the explicit design.

Use Case in a Portfolio

No serious financial framework recommends these as core holdings. The appropriate use case — if any — is as a satellite position funded with capital already earmarked for speculation. Some investors use a small CONY or TSLY position to generate weekly cash flow that gets swept into more conservative holdings (SCHD, VYM, ARCC). This "income harvesting" approach treats the YieldMax fund as a high-risk income generator with expected principal decline. Position sizing discipline is everything — most practitioners who use these limit exposure to 1-3% of total portfolio value per fund.

Which Should You Buy?

Choose CONY if:

  • You want maximum weekly income and accept crypto-level volatility in NAV
  • You have a bullish-to-neutral view on Coinbase over the near term
  • You're deploying a small satellite allocation specifically for income extraction

Choose TSLY if:

  • You want high weekly income with slightly less volatility than crypto exposure
  • You have a view on Tesla and want to monetize that volatility
  • You prefer the marginally more predictable NAV behavior of an EV stock over a crypto exchange

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Articles

strategy
NAV Erosion vs Return of Capital: What High-Yield Investors Get Wrong
Learn the critical difference between true NAV erosion and return of capital distributions.
strategy
Understanding Liquidity Risk: Why AUM Matters More Than Yield
A practical guide to evaluating liquidity risk in dividend ETFs. Learn how low AUM, thin bid-ask spreads, and fund closures silently erode returns.
strategy
The Crash Test: How the Cornerstone Portfolio Survived 2022
A data-driven backtest of the Cornerstone Strategy vs. the S&P 500 during the inflation bear market.
View all articles →

See How CONY or TSLY Fits Your Portfolio

Every investor has a unique risk profile. Use our Portfolio Intelligence tool to see the impact of adding these ETFs to your holdings.

Explore Related Comparisons

Compare CONY vs...

MSTY
JEPI

Compare TSLY vs...

JEPQ