DivAgent
LeaderboardPortfoliosPortfolio App
Log InGet Started
DivAgent

The institutional-grade income auditor for the retail investor. Stop chasing yield. Start building wealth.

Academy

  • The Income Illusion
  • Defensive Income
  • Avoid Yield Traps
  • View All Courses

Tools & Resources

  • Risk Spectrum Calculator
  • NAV Erosion Check
  • Dividend Glossary
  • Strategy Articles
  • Article Categories
  • Ticker Database Index
  • Comparison Directory

Portfolio App

  • Track Dividends
  • Import Holdings
  • View Dashboard
Free Tier Available

Company

  • Manifesto
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Join 10,000+ Dividend Investors

Weekly insights on sustainable income strategies. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Important Legal Disclaimer

DivAgent is not a registered investment advisor, broker-dealer, or financial analyst. The content on divagent.ai and app.divagent.ai, including ticker audits, risk tiers, dividend forecasts, and "Monthly Expense Kill Lists," is provided for informational and educational purposes only.

Nothing on this platform constitutes a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Investing involves substantial risk, including the possible loss of principal. Past performance, including dividend history, is no guarantee of future results.

Data Accuracy & AI Usage: Dividend data is sourced from third-party providers (including Yahoo Finance). Additionally, portions of the content on this site, including articles, summaries, and analysis, may be generated by Artificial Intelligence (AI). While we strive for accuracy, DivAgent does not guarantee the timeliness, completeness, or correctness of any data or AI-generated content. Predictive forecasts are based on mathematical heuristics and should not be relied upon for financial planning.

Limitation of Liability: DivAgent shall not be held liable for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in the content, whether human-written or AI-generated, nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

By using this site, you acknowledge that you are solely responsible for your own investment decisions. Consult with a qualified financial professional before making any financial commitments.

© 2026 DivAgent. All rights reserved.

DivAgent is an informational platform, not a registered investment advisor. Nothing here is financial advice.

LIVEComparison Engine
Last Updated: March 7, 2026

EPDvsET

Two of the market's most popular income ETFs compared side-by-side. See which one fits your yield strategy.

Data Live

What This Page Shows

  • Yield leader: ET (0.97% spread)
  • Safer risk tier: EPD
  • 1Y total return spread: 6.21%
  • Fees, NAV stability, and payout quality side-by-side
  1. Home
  2. Directory
  3. E
  4. EPD vs ET

At a Glance

HEAD-TO-HEAD
Scroll for Analysis
EPD
Enterprise
VS
ET
Energy
6.79%
Annual Yield
7.77%
Tier 3
Risk Tier
Tier 3
5.47%
1Y Total Return
-0.73%
-1.32%
1Y NAV Stability
-8.50%
—
Expense Ratio
—
-15.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y)
-22.91%
Quick Verdict: EPD wins on3key metrics.

DivAgent Risk Spectrum

Proprietary Model
Tier 1: Cornerstone
Tier 2: Yield Plus
Tier 3: Specialty
Tier 4: Harvest
Tier 5: Octane
EPD
ET
Tier 1: Cornerstone
Tier 2: Yield Plus
Tier 3: Specialty
Tier 4: Harvest
Tier 5: Octane

What this means: Both EPD and ET fall intoTier 3: Specialty. This suggests they share a similar risk profile and volatility expectation.

Deep Dive Analysis

MetricEPDET
Total Return (1Y)5.47%-0.73%
NAV Change (1Y)-1.32%-8.50%
Max Drawdown-15.40%-22.91%
Beta--

* Returns include dividend reinvestment. Drawdown calculates peak-to-trough decline over trailing 12 months.

The DivAgent Analyst Take

Enterprise Products Partners (EPD) and Energy Transfer (ET) are both Tier 3 (Sector Specialties / Medium Risk) midstream energy MLPs that operate the pipeline, storage, and processing infrastructure underpinning U.S. oil, gas, and NGL transportation. They generate revenue primarily from fee-based contracts — meaning income is less sensitive to commodity prices than upstream exploration companies. Both issue K-1 tax forms, both pay quarterly, and both yield in the 6-7% range. The meaningful difference is risk profile: EPD is the conservative blue-chip of the MLP world; ET is the higher-yielding, more leveraged alternative with a more complicated recent history.

Key Differences

Scale and Asset Quality

EPD is the largest publicly traded MLP in the U.S., operating approximately 50,000 miles of pipeline and 14 marine terminals across natural gas, NGL, crude oil, and petrochemicals. Its scale provides competitive advantages in securing contracts, accessing capital markets, and weathering energy cycles. ET is also a major operator with roughly 125,000 miles of pipeline across a broader set of hydrocarbon types, but it achieved that scale partly through aggressive acquisitions that elevated financial leverage. More assets don't automatically mean better assets — EPD's pipeline network has a long track record of high utilization and fee-based cash flow predictability.

Distribution History and Management Philosophy

EPD's 25+ consecutive years of distribution increases — through the 2008 financial crisis, the 2014-2016 oil crash, and the 2020 COVID collapse — reflects management's conservative leverage philosophy and disciplined capital allocation. EPD has historically self-funded growth projects from operating cash flow rather than relying heavily on equity issuances that dilute existing holders. ET's 2020 distribution cut was a jarring event for income investors and raised questions about management's commitment to distributions under pressure. ET has rebuilt its payout, but the breach of an uninterrupted streak carries lasting reputational weight in the income investing community.

Yield Premium and Its Source

ET's 6.9% yield represents a 1.0 percentage point premium over EPD's 5.9%. That premium reflects the market's assessment of additional risk: higher leverage, less credit rating headroom, and a distribution history with a notable interruption. For income investors willing to accept that risk, ET's higher payout is real and backed by substantial cash-generating infrastructure. For those who prioritize reliability above all — retirees, income-focused portfolios, investors who cannot tolerate distribution cuts — EPD's lower but more dependable yield is worth the trade-off.

Which Should You Buy?

Choose EPD if:

  • You want the most conservative, blue-chip MLP with 25+ years of uninterrupted distribution growth
  • You prioritize investment-grade credit quality and lower financial leverage
  • Distribution stability matters more to you than maximizing current yield

Choose ET if:

  • You want the higher 6.9% current yield and are comfortable with more leverage
  • You believe ET's simplified corporate structure improves long-term capital allocation
  • It represents a satellite position and you understand the 2020 distribution cut history

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Articles

strategy
NAV Erosion vs Return of Capital: What High-Yield Investors Get Wrong
Learn the critical difference between true NAV erosion and return of capital distributions.
strategy
Understanding Liquidity Risk: Why AUM Matters More Than Yield
A practical guide to evaluating liquidity risk in dividend ETFs. Learn how low AUM, thin bid-ask spreads, and fund closures silently erode returns.
strategy
The Crash Test: How the Cornerstone Portfolio Survived 2022
A data-driven backtest of the Cornerstone Strategy vs. the S&P 500 during the inflation bear market.
View all articles →

See How EPD or ET Fits Your Portfolio

Every investor has a unique risk profile. Use our Portfolio Intelligence tool to see the impact of adding these ETFs to your holdings.

Explore Related Comparisons

Compare EPD vs...

AMEFX
AMLP
ABNDX
AMRFX

Compare ET vs...

AMEFX
DEO
ABNDX
AMRFX