Two of the market's most popular income ETFs compared side-by-side. See which one fits your yield strategy.
What this means: Both EPD and ET fall intoTier 3: Specialty. This suggests they share a similar risk profile and volatility expectation.
| Metric | EPD | ET |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 5.47% | -0.73% |
| NAV Change (1Y) | -1.32% | -8.50% |
| Max Drawdown | -15.40% | -22.91% |
| Beta | - | - |
* Returns include dividend reinvestment. Drawdown calculates peak-to-trough decline over trailing 12 months.
Enterprise Products Partners (EPD) and Energy Transfer (ET) are both Tier 3 (Sector Specialties / Medium Risk) midstream energy MLPs that operate the pipeline, storage, and processing infrastructure underpinning U.S. oil, gas, and NGL transportation. They generate revenue primarily from fee-based contracts — meaning income is less sensitive to commodity prices than upstream exploration companies. Both issue K-1 tax forms, both pay quarterly, and both yield in the 6-7% range. The meaningful difference is risk profile: EPD is the conservative blue-chip of the MLP world; ET is the higher-yielding, more leveraged alternative with a more complicated recent history.
EPD is the largest publicly traded MLP in the U.S., operating approximately 50,000 miles of pipeline and 14 marine terminals across natural gas, NGL, crude oil, and petrochemicals. Its scale provides competitive advantages in securing contracts, accessing capital markets, and weathering energy cycles. ET is also a major operator with roughly 125,000 miles of pipeline across a broader set of hydrocarbon types, but it achieved that scale partly through aggressive acquisitions that elevated financial leverage. More assets don't automatically mean better assets — EPD's pipeline network has a long track record of high utilization and fee-based cash flow predictability.
EPD's 25+ consecutive years of distribution increases — through the 2008 financial crisis, the 2014-2016 oil crash, and the 2020 COVID collapse — reflects management's conservative leverage philosophy and disciplined capital allocation. EPD has historically self-funded growth projects from operating cash flow rather than relying heavily on equity issuances that dilute existing holders. ET's 2020 distribution cut was a jarring event for income investors and raised questions about management's commitment to distributions under pressure. ET has rebuilt its payout, but the breach of an uninterrupted streak carries lasting reputational weight in the income investing community.
ET's 6.9% yield represents a 1.0 percentage point premium over EPD's 5.9%. That premium reflects the market's assessment of additional risk: higher leverage, less credit rating headroom, and a distribution history with a notable interruption. For income investors willing to accept that risk, ET's higher payout is real and backed by substantial cash-generating infrastructure. For those who prioritize reliability above all — retirees, income-focused portfolios, investors who cannot tolerate distribution cuts — EPD's lower but more dependable yield is worth the trade-off.
Choose EPD if:
Choose ET if:
Every investor has a unique risk profile. Use our Portfolio Intelligence tool to see the impact of adding these ETFs to your holdings.