DivAgent
LeaderboardPortfoliosPortfolio App
Log InGet Started
DivAgent

The institutional-grade income auditor for the retail investor. Stop chasing yield. Start building wealth.

Academy

  • The Income Illusion
  • Defensive Income
  • Avoid Yield Traps
  • View All Courses

Tools & Resources

  • Risk Spectrum Calculator
  • NAV Erosion Check
  • Dividend Glossary
  • Strategy Articles
  • Article Categories
  • Ticker Database Index
  • Comparison Directory

Portfolio App

  • Track Dividends
  • Import Holdings
  • View Dashboard
Free Tier Available

Company

  • Manifesto
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Join 10,000+ Dividend Investors

Weekly insights on sustainable income strategies. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Important Legal Disclaimer

DivAgent is not a registered investment advisor, broker-dealer, or financial analyst. The content on divagent.ai and app.divagent.ai, including ticker audits, risk tiers, dividend forecasts, and "Monthly Expense Kill Lists," is provided for informational and educational purposes only.

Nothing on this platform constitutes a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Investing involves substantial risk, including the possible loss of principal. Past performance, including dividend history, is no guarantee of future results.

Data Accuracy & AI Usage: Dividend data is sourced from third-party providers (including Yahoo Finance). Additionally, portions of the content on this site, including articles, summaries, and analysis, may be generated by Artificial Intelligence (AI). While we strive for accuracy, DivAgent does not guarantee the timeliness, completeness, or correctness of any data or AI-generated content. Predictive forecasts are based on mathematical heuristics and should not be relied upon for financial planning.

Limitation of Liability: DivAgent shall not be held liable for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in the content, whether human-written or AI-generated, nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

By using this site, you acknowledge that you are solely responsible for your own investment decisions. Consult with a qualified financial professional before making any financial commitments.

© 2026 DivAgent. All rights reserved.

DivAgent is an informational platform, not a registered investment advisor. Nothing here is financial advice.

LIVEComparison Engine
Last Updated: March 7, 2026

GPIQvsJEPQ

Two of the market's most popular income ETFs compared side-by-side. See which one fits your yield strategy.

Data Live

What This Page Shows

  • Yield leader: GPIQ (1.13% spread)
  • Safer risk tier: GPIQ
  • 1Y total return spread: 3.51%
  • Fees, NAV stability, and payout quality side-by-side
  1. Home
  2. Directory
  3. G
  4. GPIQ vs JEPQ

At a Glance

HEAD-TO-HEAD
Scroll for Analysis
GPIQ
Goldman
VS
JEPQ
JPMorgan
10.83%
Annual Yield
9.70%
Tier 4
Risk Tier
Tier 4
20.05%
1Y Total Return
16.54%
9.22%
1Y NAV Stability
6.84%
0.29%
Expense Ratio
0.35%
-27.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y)
-23.48%
Quick Verdict: GPIQ wins on4key metrics.

DivAgent Risk Spectrum

Proprietary Model
Tier 1: Cornerstone
Tier 2: Yield Plus
Tier 3: Specialty
Tier 4: Harvest
Tier 5: Octane
GPIQ
JEPQ
Tier 1: Cornerstone
Tier 2: Yield Plus
Tier 3: Specialty
Tier 4: Harvest
Tier 5: Octane

What this means: Both GPIQ and JEPQ fall intoTier 4: Harvest. This suggests they share a similar risk profile and volatility expectation.

Deep Dive Analysis

MetricGPIQJEPQ
Total Return (1Y)20.05%16.54%
NAV Change (1Y)9.22%6.84%
Max Drawdown-27.76%-23.48%
Beta-0.85

* Returns include dividend reinvestment. Drawdown calculates peak-to-trough decline over trailing 12 months.

The DivAgent Analyst Take

GPIQ (Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income) and JEPQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income) are the high-octane siblings of the covered call ETF world — both targeting the same Nasdaq-100 index, both paying monthly distributions around 10%, and both rated Tier 4 (Volatility Harvest/High) on DivAgent's risk spectrum. The comparison mirrors GPIX vs JEPI but with higher stakes: the Nasdaq-100's tech concentration amplifies both the income opportunity and the downside risk.

Key Differences

Yield and Monthly Income

GPIQ currently yields approximately 10.2% at $51.57 per share; JEPQ yields approximately 10.7% at $57.58. The 50-basis-point gap slightly favors JEPQ, but both distributions fluctuate with options premium — which spikes in volatile markets and compresses in calm trending markets. Neither ETF offers a guaranteed fixed distribution. Investors modeling income should plan for distribution variability of 25-40% from month to month in different volatility regimes.

Structural Mechanics and Counterparty Risk

GPIQ writes listed Nasdaq-100 index options with exchange-cleared settlement — no single counterparty owns the income stream. JEPQ uses equity-linked notes structured by JPMorgan, introducing counterparty exposure to JPMorgan Chase. This is the same structural distinction as GPIX versus JEPI: listed options offer transparency, ELNs offer engineering flexibility. For most investors, JPMorgan's credit quality makes the counterparty risk theoretical. But investors who prefer structural transparency should give GPIQ the edge on this dimension.

AUM, Brand, and Track Record

JEPQ launched in May 2022 and has grown to $20B+ in assets, backed by JPMorgan's massive advisor distribution network and the halo effect of JEPI's earlier success. GPIQ is the newer entrant from Goldman Sachs with a smaller but growing asset base. JEPQ's larger AUM translates to better secondary market liquidity and a longer real-world performance record across different market environments — a meaningful advantage for risk-conscious income investors who want to see how a strategy behaves under stress before committing capital.

Which Should You Buy?

Choose GPIQ if:

  • You prefer listed options transparency and no ELN counterparty exposure
  • You want Goldman Sachs management with a 10%+ yield target
  • You're comfortable with a smaller, newer fund from an established institution

Choose JEPQ if:

  • You want the largest, most liquid Nasdaq-100 covered call ETF available
  • You value JEPQ's longer track record through the 2022 bear market
  • You're comfortable with JPMorgan's ELN structure for a marginally higher yield

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Articles

strategy
NAV Erosion vs Return of Capital: What High-Yield Investors Get Wrong
Learn the critical difference between true NAV erosion and return of capital distributions.
strategy
Understanding Liquidity Risk: Why AUM Matters More Than Yield
A practical guide to evaluating liquidity risk in dividend ETFs. Learn how low AUM, thin bid-ask spreads, and fund closures silently erode returns.
strategy
The Crash Test: How the Cornerstone Portfolio Survived 2022
A data-driven backtest of the Cornerstone Strategy vs. the S&P 500 during the inflation bear market.
View all articles →

See How GPIQ or JEPQ Fits Your Portfolio

Every investor has a unique risk profile. Use our Portfolio Intelligence tool to see the impact of adding these ETFs to your holdings.

Explore Related Comparisons

Compare GPIQ vs...

ABNDX
AMEFX
AMRFX
BIL

Compare JEPQ vs...

ABNDX
AMEFX
AMRFX
BIL